RTI blues

rti blues

 

You thought the Right to Information Act instilled transparency in governance? Think again. A PIL filed by advocate Sanjeeb Panigrahi in the Supreme Court cited documentary evidence to show that principal information officers (PIOs) demanded money for parting with required information asked by RTI applicants, when, in fact, it should be free. The PIL stated that such a move was tantamount to stifling the act itself. The petitioner  further said that despite a statutory provision of imposing penalty on PIOs who are late in providing information, the rule was hardly applied.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s